Just an observation, but a troubling one.
Somewhere near the end of the 20th century, wealth got faster. Not just more—but more visible. In the West, they called them billionaires. In Russia, oligarchs. Elsewhere—names varied, but the pattern held.
The West: Innovation, Deregulation, and the Ladder
In the U.S. and parts of Europe, the 1980s and 90s were deregulated on purpose. Government stepped back. Markets opened. Entrepreneurs stepped in, especially in tech, finance, and media. In 1916, the world had one billionaire. In 2025, the U.S. alone has over 900. That’s not a detail. That’s a landscape.
Russia: Collapse and Transfer
The Soviet Union fell. What was owned by all became owned by a few. Cheaply, quickly, and often quietly. Those few—well connected, well timed—became oligarchs. They didn’t build systems. They claimed them.
China: State and Market, Hand in Hand
In China, the party didn’t fall. It opened a door. Private enterprise met central planning. Factories became fortunes. By 2025, China had more than 450 billionaires. The model is hybrid: directed capitalism with state permission.
India: Acceleration
India’s rise came later, but hard and fast. From 70 billionaires in 2014 to nearly 300 by 2025. Tech, industry, healthcare, and hunger. Old wealth grew. New wealth sprinted. Startups weren’t just ideas—they were claims to place.
Japan: Consistent, Contained
Japan moved steadily. No surge, no collapse. Just fifty or so billionaires, quietly placed. Stability slowed the climb. So did an aging population and cultural restraint.
Same Forces, Different Outcomes
What drove it? Globalization. Deregulation. Privatization. But the tools were different:
• In the West: invention and scaling.
• In Russia: privatized state property.
• In China: policy-enabled growth.
• In India: raw entrepreneurial force.
• In Japan: structure and endurance.
The pattern was familiar: Concentration of wealth, influence beyond money, and individuals with leverage over systems.
Why It Matters
Wealth doesn’t just sit. It moves policy, shapes discourse, bends law. The billionaires and oligarchs didn’t just rise. They altered the terrain. This isn’t about envy. It’s about structure. Who benefits. Who decides. Who remains.
The question isn’t just how they rose. It’s what happens to the rest of us while they never come down.
About johndiestler
Retired community college professor of graphic design, multimedia and photography, and chair of the fine arts and media department.
Billionaires and Oligarchs: Same Storm, Different Boats
Just an observation, but a troubling one.
Somewhere near the end of the 20th century, wealth got faster. Not just more—but more visible. In the West, they called them billionaires. In Russia, oligarchs. Elsewhere—names varied, but the pattern held.
The West: Innovation, Deregulation, and the Ladder
In the U.S. and parts of Europe, the 1980s and 90s were deregulated on purpose. Government stepped back. Markets opened. Entrepreneurs stepped in, especially in tech, finance, and media. In 1916, the world had one billionaire. In 2025, the U.S. alone has over 900. That’s not a detail. That’s a landscape.
Russia: Collapse and Transfer
The Soviet Union fell. What was owned by all became owned by a few. Cheaply, quickly, and often quietly. Those few—well connected, well timed—became oligarchs. They didn’t build systems. They claimed them.
China: State and Market, Hand in Hand
In China, the party didn’t fall. It opened a door. Private enterprise met central planning. Factories became fortunes. By 2025, China had more than 450 billionaires. The model is hybrid: directed capitalism with state permission.
India: Acceleration
India’s rise came later, but hard and fast. From 70 billionaires in 2014 to nearly 300 by 2025. Tech, industry, healthcare, and hunger. Old wealth grew. New wealth sprinted. Startups weren’t just ideas—they were claims to place.
Japan: Consistent, Contained
Japan moved steadily. No surge, no collapse. Just fifty or so billionaires, quietly placed. Stability slowed the climb. So did an aging population and cultural restraint.
Same Forces, Different Outcomes
What drove it? Globalization. Deregulation. Privatization. But the tools were different:
• In the West: invention and scaling.
• In Russia: privatized state property.
• In China: policy-enabled growth.
• In India: raw entrepreneurial force.
• In Japan: structure and endurance.
The pattern was familiar: Concentration of wealth, influence beyond money, and individuals with leverage over systems.
Why It Matters
Wealth doesn’t just sit. It moves policy, shapes discourse, bends law. The billionaires and oligarchs didn’t just rise. They altered the terrain. This isn’t about envy. It’s about structure. Who benefits. Who decides. Who remains.
The question isn’t just how they rose. It’s what happens to the rest of us while they never come down.
Share this:
About johndiestler
Retired community college professor of graphic design, multimedia and photography, and chair of the fine arts and media department.