Multitasking
We have all heard that the secret to life’s success is to do a lot of multitasking. Meaning, I suppose, that whatever you are doing, learn to do two or three things simultaneously, in order to get ahead and be successful. It doesn’t matter that there are studies that show that humans can’t multitask, and never have.
Certainly we can see and hear at the same time, and we can walk and breathe at the same time. But it doesn’t mean that we can process two different sets of data in order to create action. What we are very good at is “fast switching”.
I didn’t say that we can walk and chew gum at the same time, but we can, because both walking and chewing have certain aspects of “automatic mode” in terms of thinking. A drummer can beat out a rhythm with her left hand while steadily beating another rhythm with the right, but they are in automatic mode with thought controlling only the beginning and the end.
The classic teenage response is that “I can listen to music and study at the same thine.” This is only true if one action becomes automatic with no thought behind it. If the music becomes “background noise”, then perhaps study can occur. But if a lyric catches your ear, then suddenly you are pulled out of your text or essay, and you are listening and not studying.
I don’t know if any study of schizophrenia shows the ability to multitask, but at least the theory that it takes two minds to have two thoughts simultaneously is correct.
So, how fast is our “switching” ability? How many eggs can we juggle before the entire cartoon is destroyed?
Well, it depends. Most nerve signals travel at roughly .3 seconds from brain to extreme limb. However, most can blink an eye in .1 of a second. That’s three times faster, (however, brain and eye are considerably closer together). We are now only talking about the signal to move, not the assessment and calculations that are necessary to consider the action. All that takes additional time.
My wife and I enjoy playing cards together, generally with another couple. I should say that the enjoyment is not equally and consistently shared. It has evolved from playing games of clever strategy, with bidding, or calculating odds- to games of action and stress, as the situation is fast paced and in constant flux.
One particular game requires that you play a solitaire situation in front of you, turning three cards from the deck in order to see what can be played. That can be stressful if there is a time element in order to beat the other players. They have their own decks and their own game of solitaire. Add to that stress by playing the aces on piles in front of you along with all the other players, collectively.
I have my solitaire game in front of me but the aces piles are constantly changing. If I concentrate on my hand, looking to play cards, I am aware of the cards I need, except on the ace pike everyone else is playing and what is needed is in flux.
My neurons are firing, but often they are firing on old information. I’m looking for a two of clubs and the pile is now at the seven of clubs.
The hand must be faster, but the data behind the movement has to be even faster, and keep track of the changes.
What is curious to me is that often my wife is holding a card in her playing hand, waiting for me to recognize that I have a play, then tenths of a second after I play she puts hers down. Spooky! How does she know what I am going to play before I even turn my cards?
I can understand how someone is faster. Both are ready, the shot is fired and one person crosses the line first. But she crosses the finish line before I can tie my track shoes.
I used to play racquetball. When I played younger faster players I would win only if I played smarter. But what I f they are faster, smarter, and have psychic powers?
Multitasking? Apparently I can chew gum and walk. But I cannot rotate through a deck of cards three at a time, play solitaire, and watch as everyone keeps playing in the ace piles.
We call the game “Squeal”, maybe because of the joy of winning, maybe because of the sound of my losing.
The First Author
I’ve never really stopped to consider who the first author was. I suppose I always knew it was knowable—I just didn’t know it.Hmm. Knowable. That implies some things are unknowable. And that seems true enough. But now I’m wondering: what even is a fact? And are facts just stabilized opinions? Can a world run on opinion?
Worthy questions—but let me step back. Back to knowing and not knowing. Everything that can be known splits into two camps: the knowing of a thing, and the not knowing of it. Which camp we fall into depends entirely on the subject. Take, for instance, Christopher Columbus. Who knows he discovered America in 1492? Some people don’t. Some once knew and forgot. Some heard it but never registered it. Some never heard it at all.
And some know because they read it—in textbooks, biographies, or archives. They trust the source. We call those sources primary when they’re close to the original. I trust my sources. I fall into the camp that knows Columbus landed in the Americas on October 12, 1492. I believe that because experts who studied his original logbooks say so. Except—uh oh—those logbooks were given to Spanish royalty in 1493, and they’ve never been seen since.
But before they vanished, a copy was made—called the Barcelona Copy. Columbus carried that copy on future voyages, and it stayed with him until his death in 1506. It passed to his son Fernando, who used it to write a biography in 1538. In 1530, Bartolomé de las Casas used it to compose the Diario. That’s the earliest surviving text that describes the discovery. Uh oh again—the Barcelona Copy hasn’t been seen since 1584. Which means: all modern experts reference Las Casas’ Diario.
And all history teachers reference other teachers, who reference teachers, who reference that one source. This, apparently, is how we know things. Except… Columbus didn’t really discover America. The Vikings beat him by centuries. They landed in Nova Scotia. There’s literature and archaeological evidence for that. Some even suggest the Phoenicians—swept off course while rounding Africa—may have reached Central America, bringing pyramids and myth. That’s not confirmed, but it’s a theory.
So what do we know? Knowing is tenuous. And at any given time, the number of people who truly know something may be much smaller than we assume.
—
Today, I revisited a site I admire: The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature. It contains primary source translations from Sumer, often considered the first known civilization—because they left writing behind. I’ve studied cuneiform. I can recognize the letter shapes. But when those signs become words, I’m lost. I rely on scholars who can read it. And the good news? Multiple translations say basically the same thing. I trust their expertise. I accept their conclusions as… fact.
One of my most popular blog posts is a collection of Sumerian Proverbs. It draws readers every year. Today, I was browsing new translations when one line arrested me: “My king, something has been created that no one has created before.” That line stopped me. It was composed from 37 tablets found in Ur, written by a woman named Enheduanna, around 2350–2270 BC.
She was the daughter of Sargon of Akkad (2340–2284 BC)—not the one mentioned in Isaiah 20:1 (that’s Sargon II, 722–705 BC), but likely the original Šarru-kin, meaning “true king” or “king established.” Probably a title more than a name. Sargon married Taslultum and had five children: Manishtusu, Rimush, Enheduanna, Ibarum (Shu-Enlil), and Abaish-Takal.Each was given power. They stayed in power across generations. Rimush took the throne after Sargon and ruled for 9 years. Then Manishtusu, for 15. His son Naram-Sin ruled for 56 years. Enheduanna served them all—her father, her brothers, and her nephew. She was appointed High Priestess of Inanna and Nanna, exiled for a time, but reinstated.
She’s credited with standardizing temple hymns across the empire—a practical and theological unification. That book of hymns, the Sumerian Temple Hymns, may be what she meant when she wrote: “I have created something that no one has created before.” That line—written on tablets, duplicated across temples, preserved in translation—makes her the first known author in human history. And she didn’t just write for the job. She wrote for the heart.
Her other work, The Exaltation of Inanna, is a personal devotion—a song of awe and divine power. These are its first lines:
Lady of all the divine powers, resplendent light, righteous woman clothed in radiance, beloved of An and Uraš! Mistress of heaven, with the great diadem, who loves the good headdress befitting the office of en priestess, who has seized all seven of its divine powers! My lady, you are the guardian of the great divine powers!…
Today, I know a new thing. And it’s old. And it matters.
My intrepation